Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum information channel

More from the Tmxxine lot. -- The Anome 09:25, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete EddEdmondson 09:54, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. I really wonder what they think they're achieving. Andrewa 10:41, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Tentatively delete unless someone can convince me that said article is actually in English rather than merely containing a bunch of words thrown together; swift perusal of User:Tmxxine does not increase confidence. What is really annoying is that there is probably a perfectly good meaning for this term which has been highjacked by a bunch of weed-stoking nutballs... sorry, rant over Nice eyeballs though :-) --Phil | Talk 13:43, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Evidently trash. [[User:AmarChandra|Amar | Talk]] 14:50, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: They're watching me! Delete for pseudo-science/fantasy/nonsense. Geogre 16:52, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Digging the eyeballs! Those might be going on my user page. But...if this is another offbeat rant disguised as fact, delete it. But not before I get the eyeballs! - Lucky 6.9 00:18, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: The eyeballs are from glambam, and despite what the image description page says are not public domain... but that's another issue. Andrewa 12:16, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless cleaned up. Does this qualify as BJAODN material? --Luc "Somethingorother" French 06:46, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)