User talk:Meggar

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Nice to see another contributor interested in railroad topics

It's nice to see another contributor interested in railroad topics. You might want to check out WikiProject Trains, too. Thanks, —Morven 18:55, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter pics

Hi, I've noticed that you've removed a picture from De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter. I reverted, but you reverted it back. I don't want to violate the 3-revert-rule but you've offered no explanation of any kind for the removal. Could you please comment over at Talk:De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter to explain why you don't think this picture should be included? Otherwise, I will replace the picture shortly. Thanks, -Lommer | ^talk 19:29, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry - I just realized the problem, forget the whole thing. -Lommer | ^talk 19:37, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

1942 Steel picture caption

Hello: The caption in the article steel now says that the steel is being poured into a mold. My steelmaking days were in a continuous casting plant but I think the previous caption saying that the steel was being poured into an open hearth furnace is probably correct. You can see doors of the furnace behind the ladele in the background. Molds for large forgings would be either open on all sides or else located in a pit below the teeming floor. --Wtshymanski 21:44, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Edit to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory

Hi. I was wondering why you removed the link to the Failure article? I clicked on it and found a lengthy article about the film. David L Rattigan

Swing bridge pix

Very nice contribution Image:Railway_swing_bridge.jpg. I was wondering if you have access to that site for another view. I need a good picture of a timber trestle for that article, and the right approach to the bridge would be suitable. Thanks, Leonard G. 04:36, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The new pix is nice and will illustrate the principle (you will see in 5 min in Trestle, but where is "here" (where the longer pix are)? Leonard G. 01:46, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image, the article now looks great! Best wishes, Leonard G. 01:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a taxobox for bridge type articles that includes an image and image title - this is needed to avoid bad image flow around the taxobox in some circumstances, and also seems appropriate as a presentation (see clapper bridge). The problem is that now the trestle article is dominated by the taxobox image (due to its aspect ratio) and a clip of this would cut off useful information. The wooden trestle really should be the introductory image, but an image more resembling the steel trestle shown would be better for the layout. Any possibility of an image that would show what the current wood trestle image shows, but with a more appropriate aspect ratio? (I know this sounds a bit fussy, but I think layout is important, especially for this suite of articles indexed by bridge, which I hope to bring to featured article *suite* status.) Thanks, Leonard G. 01:13, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relays

Yes, good edit on that one. Light current 05:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for helping with spammers. Pavel Vozenilek 23:24, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto -- you beat me to one today, and when I looked I saw you got about 5 from the same person. Way to Wiki! Coll7 01:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sevigny and everyone else

"Alright, that is a good link for Chloë Sevigny being part Polish. If she says so then it is correct. That is the only acceptable criterion. Each person picks his or her own label, if any. No other facts or opinions matter. Meggar 03:04, 2005 September 6 (UTC)"

OBVIOUSLY. Where do you think all of my info is from? Either interviews or biographies/profiles, etc. That is my area of expertise. Don't revert ANY of my info unless you can find something that directly contradicts it (and I don't mean those one-sentence trivita bits on some websites that say Leelee Sobieski is of "Polish and French" descent", many bits like that are either out-rite wrong or misleading. Interviews or in-depth profiles are the only good sources). Most of the "Jewish Americans" people would hardly consider themselves "German Americans" or whatever, especially after having to escape whichever country to avoid persecution. And none of the ones I removed have any actual ethnic German/Latvian/etc. ancestry.

Anyway, just because Sevigny's last name sounds French doesn't mean she is 100% French, as you have obviously discovered. She probably just has some distant French ancestry - and I only left the "French heritage" thing on there for novelty value. Never ever assume anything, check. I have checked - so either trust me or find info that proves me wrong. But never just revert my edits without proof of your own. Very counter-productive.

Blue Raspberry /Black cap

Dear Meggar, I dont know if you live in the L.A. surroundings, but since I remember we went to Westwood to collect "Blue Raspberries". No one called these dark red to clear blue raspberries(Rubus leucodermis-not Rubus occidentalis) a blackcap-just blue raspberries. Blackcaps have been kinds of boysenberries aud other black-not blue colored rubus species. Saludos --Quer 20:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

pin and sleeve/IEC 309

over at Industrial and multiphase plugs and sockets you added "Pin and Sleeve circular connectors are not compatible with the newer IEC 309 type.". The way this is written kind of implies that IEC 309 is used in the US too. Is this the case? Plugwash 21:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Afraid not, though I'm not aware of the vandalism in the first place. MOD 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wooden trestle bridge approach.JPG

Hi, just curious but where is the bridge in Image:Wooden trestle bridge approach.JPG? Regards--A Y Arktos\^talk 21:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Turbine

I have put some arguments on the Turbine talk page. Please read and comment.--EvenT 10:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ledum groenlandicum.jpg

Hi Meggar,

I am moving your picture to commons, its name there is . You put a nice GFDL tag on it, which means we need to specify a source. Did you take this picture yourself?

t.i.a.,

TeunSpaans 18:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(compliments, btw, nice pic))

Done, thanks. Time to put names on the others. Meggar 19:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lift and Bernoulli's principle

Hi there Meggan,

Thought I'd drop you a note in regard to the "Wing" article and your reversions. My amendments to the "Science of the wing" was an attempt to make the "Wing" article consistent with the "Lift (force)" article. I'm not sure if you are reading the "Lift(force)" article correctly. The Lift(force) article is a very comprehensive and correct discussion on lift and it actually attributes lift to Newton's third law of motion. It then raises Bernoulli's principle and the mathematics behind it which can be used to calculate lift (as Lift is one of the variables) but it is not responsible for lift itself.

It states "The force on the wing can also be examined in terms of the pressure differences above and below the wing.". The words "...can also be examined in terms of..." are very different from "...can be explained by...".

In fact, further down the page disguised under the title "Common misconceptions - Equal Transit Time", the author says exactly this (I based part of my edit on this text). "Equal Transit Time" which is what the Bernoulli effect claims to do to the air flowing around wings to create lift, is a misconception (It probably would have been more obvious if the author titled this "Bernoulli Effect"). Reading it he actually states "Such an explanation would predict that an aircraft could not fly inverted, which is demonstrably not the case." and, "It is unclear why this explanation has gained such currency, except by repetition by authors of populist (rather than rigorously scientific) books and perhaps the fact that the explanation is easiest to grasp intuitively without mathematics...Albert Einstein, in attempting to design a practical aircraft based on this principle, came up with an airfoil section that featured a large hump on its upper surface, on the basis that an even longer path must aid lift if the principle is true. Its performance was terrible."

Hope this helps.

Best regards,Fthiang 04:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You did not put the homology link back into the article

Please stop deleting the discussion page homology material which is meant to settle disputes. It is rude behavior. 136.183.146.158 06:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

singer

May I ask you, why did u change the image of Indian singer from the article. There also 2 other images. But why don't u change that also? Jpandey 08:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potato revision...

I just looked over an edit I made yesterday to the Potato article's 'Trivia' section - Why was the factoid about Dan Quayle removed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arkmtech (talk • contribs) 00:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Edit to Protist

Hi, sorry about about the revision. Is it a good idea to just leave the table and create a sub-section for the 4 main phyla? K e yblad e S e phi ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Autograph)} 03:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon steel

At first I want to thank you for fixing the reference in "types of carbon steel". You also removed my sentence about cast iron from the page with the reason usable cast iron doesn't conform to the intro, which I do not understand exactly (I know the temptation to write short summaries of edits myself, though ;)). What exactly do you mean by that? I think it was a quite useful sentence because it explains what iron with even more carbon in it is, since this is a list ordered by carbon content. Of course this does not conform to the intro sentence, but that is what I tried to say with "has quite different properties". I guess you made some accessibility considerations when deleting it, so I'm willing to learn. Tierlieb 18:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Gannon

You're a genius. The simple act of moving a few things around really improved the article, and may have offered a solution to a content dispute. Thanks. - Crockspot 19:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto to that!!! What were we thinking, Crockspot??!! Way to go, Meggar!! Much appreciated! Sdth 21:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saskatoon berries.jpg

Hello, Meggar. I noticed you uploaded Image:Saskatoon berries.jpg in July 2005, and also that this image is missing a copyright tag. I added {{GFDL-presumed}}, but it would be great if you could clarify the copyright status of this image. Let me know if you have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Monotropa uniflora "dark environment"

Meggar, I remain to be convinced that there exist any "very dark environments where other small photosynthetic plants could not [grow], as in the understory of dense forest." Do you have a citation or example? The Pacific Northwest might be one, I haven't seen the rainforest in Olympic National Park. But this photo from there shows mosses: http://www.nps.gov/archive/olym/plants/monuni.htm

Dave Matthews 21:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Amelanchier alnifolia

I am seeking permission to use the photo Image:Amelanchier alnifolia.jpg by Meggar in an upcoming publication of Popular Farming Series. Am I free to use this image in our publication and how would you like for the image to be attributed in the magazine?

Please contact me at sstaton@bowtieinc.com.

Thank you.

Sstaton80 19:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo War

Speculations, or anything controversial, cannot be presented at the fact table. You can write about it somewhere in the article instead! Thank you, --Albanau 06:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of High-end audio cables

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is High-end audio cables. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-end audio cables. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pipe wrench patent.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pipe wrench patent.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squirrel_cage.jpg

Hi Meggar, I just saw your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Squirrel_cage.jpg and I was wondering whether you could provide me the original 3D file; I'd like to work it out to a full squirrel cage motor.

Thanks in advance, User:KVDP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.251.226 (talk) 13:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clark y.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clark y.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:C connector.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]