Talk:Axeman
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axeman)
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]from VfD:
Slangdef, and a rather non-notable one at that. --fvw* 18:01, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)
- Delete - David Gerard 20:35, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I've never heard of either usage. --InShaneee 20:39, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - If I get a vote? I have never heard the term either. --myork 20:41, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep:A rather poor stub agreed, but there is a Wikipedia request for this page here. [1] A common word in Europe for some-one with a problem, and there are far worse stubs about. Who knows a beautiful swan may arise. Giano 20:45, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: On reflection looking at the links provided there probably is an article here, but in its present form, it is probably some-one having a laugh, so unless it is re-written fairly quickly delete Giano 13:51, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
*Keep, I'm sure Giano intends to nurture the duckling into a swan.--Bishonen | Talk 21:10, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I aint nurturing nothing, but google results in 88,900 for the term, as defined in the article.Giano 21:44, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, I am thinking the links I have ordered have solved this question. Calcagno 23:13, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Wiktionary. RickK 00:24, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable slang (when you filter Google results). Megan1967 02:13, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not noteworthy. --Spangineer ∞ 02:45, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
- "In rare instances it refers to a man using an axe in a perfectly legitimate fashion, but this is unusual." Utter rubbish. This is a very common occurrence in literature. Compare "headsman", for starters. The dictionary definition is the usual definition. Try reading less Google and reading more books. Delete. It's already in Wiktionary. Uncle G 02:51, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to Delete, impressed by "utter rubbish" argument.--Bishonen | Talk 14:32, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I've removed the silly neologism and turned it into a disambiguation page. -Sean Curtin 07:39, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And Wiktionary already has an article (although it could use the slang definition). —Simetrical (talk) 22:24, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
end moved discussion