User talk:Bonus Onus

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bonus Onus has not edited Wikipedia since 20 August 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Anyway, I just thought you might like to know that you don't need to use piped syntax, like [[duck|ducks]], to create a plural link to a singular article in most cases. You can just append the "s" like [[duck]]s. See: ducks. - RedWordSmith 03:25, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

DUDE!

Thank you so much for your wonderful adds to Freedman's Bureau! That article has been sadly lacking for too long. Bravo. Seriously. :) jengod 01:25, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

Copyvio/plagiarism

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and specifically thanks for creating an article about the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act. As you know, I discovered that it was copied from a copyrighted website. Wikipedia has a process for clearing out such materials, which seems to take a week or two. Until then, please do not edit the article. I've moved the new draft you created to a temp page, Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act/Temp, where you can continue to edit it until the process is completed. At that point the administrators will move the temp draft into the main article page. Sorry it's so complicated. Cheers, -Willmcw 04:32, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

Pesticide

Made some changes to the page as you requested. -Shoefly

MAC cannon

Thanks for the cleanup and title correction on MAC cannon. FYI, next time you need to rename an article use the Move tab near the top of the screen between History and Watch. This will accomplish pretty much the same thing you did; it renames the article and creates a redirect at the old name. But the most important aspect is that it also preserves the history of the article and moves the talk pages so they're not lost. - NormanEinstein 02:12, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Well, thank you! I don't think anyone's ever left me a message just to tell me I'm awesome. :-) Incidentally, my favorite weird Latin phrase is "semper ubi sub ubi", which was the motto of my district's quiz bowl team in HS. (Yes, I took the test, but I got a lame one.) Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:12, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for editing my English! in the article about Felix Varela SilentVoice 17:39, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

My mistake

Actually the link is on a vivid conspiracy website, but the actual article is quite good. I should have checked it after I sorted the links. --Cberlet 03:07, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Scalawags

Message for Bonus Onus: Edit Scalawag paper online biotch also change the title to "The Scalawags" thanks a lot, thought i'd give you something to do

Jackson image

Usually, the images are supposed to alternate left and right in an article. Doesn't work for all of them, I suppose. Change it back if you like. :) ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 23:58, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Pesticide Article

Point taken - although I have fixed the external link. --Spe88 July 5, 2005 20:38 (UTC)

Who are you?

What high school do you go to that you know of Omar Beckins? Are you even still in high school? I won't tell anyone, I promise. I am a moron because I don't believe that Omar is real. It turns out, I know that you still teach at White Plains High School but I want to pretend that you don't to defame you and the honorable Omar Q Beckins. J. Finkelstein 04:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:MaybachBlue.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MaybachBlue.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Q. Beckins

You have recently created the article Omar Q Beckins. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -- Rhobite 23:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Why should we possibly not recreate this article? Your ignorance is astounding. THis man was a nobleman who should be honored and you spit on his feet by not recognizing him as a true hero. You are the fucking antichrist and we hope you rot in hell. I have personally played in his namesake tournamnet for the past four years and I have won it twice. Rot in fucking hell bitches.[reply]

Blank map of India

Hi! You recently voted for the blank map of India saying that it is too "sparse" and visually uninteresting. I would like to know how I could address your comments. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonus, thanks for your feedback! I could add some cities and rivers, but the actual intention was to create a locator map for cities in India. I'll elaborate:

Note the maps on these articles: Mount Rushmore and Glacier National Park (US)
If you notice carefully, the file name of the locator map is the same, only the red location dot changes.
The technology behind the locator maps is detailed here: Template talk:Infobox protected area
This map aims to achive the same purpose.

Now I can add cities and rivers, but it would make the locator map a little too untidy, when the resolution is scaled down. If you are familiar with SVG images, all that needs to be done is to draw the rivers on another layer and upload the file. Infact since this is an SVG map, a *lot* can be done to modify and add stuff over it. Even the states can be hidden!

I hope this is a sufficient and valid reply to your suggestions. (Secretely hoping that you could reconsider your vote :) ). Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 03:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Snail-WA

Hi Bonus Onus!
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Snail-WA seems to be getting into a bit of a bog. Could you please specify which version your vote goes for? This will help to reach a consensus on which version to promote. Thanks! --Fir0002 10:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Q

HE IS REAL!

It's a conspiracy!

Well, I am doing some more research and writing on 9/11 conspiracy theories as "analogs" of the historic Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Freemason/Illuminati myths, (hope to have a book chapter published next year) and will rejoin the fray on the entry page soon. I'll go read it and see if I think it has improved.--Cberlet 20:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Biofuel#biofuel/no CO2?

Talk:Biofuel#biofuel/no CO2?. Comment added. --Tunheim 11:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg

Hello, Bonus Onus. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bonus Onus. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:John madden football.jpg

Hello, Bonus Onus. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:John madden football.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bonus Onus. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 15:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Favorite shows

Heh, thanks. I fixed it. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock, Paper, Scissors

Hi BO
I see you added the alternative names of Roshambo and Rochambeau to Rock, Paper, Scissors, I must confess I never heard of theese names before, can you perhaps tell something about how they come to use and in what area of the world they are used, this is just to satisfy my own curisosity.
Best regards and happy editing. Mads Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 09:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer, with facebook, you mean the website? - Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 16:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Soriano3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soriano3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Captain Keyes (Halo screenshot).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Orphan

Is there anything else you need? If not, you should remove the tag from the talk page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Ok, that's it, i will. thanks. -Bonus Onus 05:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Dartmouth College, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Dartmouth College. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Dylan 09:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of the 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities

You still don't seem to have got a response in that talk page (the thread you posted has 3 posts over the length of a year...) and the only reply you've had at Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies is from me (fuller response there if you want to read it). I somewhat doubt that sticking "suggested merge" tags on the pair of (obviously redundant) articles since it seems unlikely that consensus would emerge if only due to inactivity. My suggest is that one of the two should be taken to WP:AFD - probably Summary of the 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities since (a) it has a daft title (no article should need to start "summary of...", that's what all encyclopedia articles should be trying to be) and (b) it doesn't seem to be linked to to the same extent as the other (i.e. "2004 United States election voting controversies" seems to be the "main" article). Does that make sense to you? If you think the logic seems sound I'm happy to stick my neck out and make the nom... TheGrappler 02:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

right, the nomination's at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summary of the 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities... this isn't canvassing, just thought you ought to know since I'm only nominating it as a result of your talk page comment on the article! TheGrappler 03:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:John madden football.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John madden football.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Punky Skunk Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Punky Skunk Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 15:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Loaded_Weapon_1_poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Loaded_Weapon_1_poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bonus Onus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Robert V. Remini - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prod vs. AfD

Please don't mix up the prod and AfD processes as you did with Benjamin Chertoff. Prod is a one-step process for deletions which you think that no one would oppose, while AfD is a 3-step process to initiate a community discussion on whether an article should be deleted. If you place a prod tag on an article, there is no need to start a deletion discussion unless that prod is removed or contested. I have converted the prod of Benjamin Chertoff to an AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Bonus Onus/Omar Q Beckins

User:Bonus Onus/Omar Q Beckins, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bonus Onus/Omar Q Beckins and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bonus Onus/Omar Q Beckins during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fences&Windows 18:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of this policy. I would have told you you are welcome to delete it, but it looks like you already did. Bonus Onus (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:List of "largest" articles

Wikipedia:List of "largest" articles, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of "largest" articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of "largest" articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

T Ros listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T Ros. Since you had some involvement with the T Ros redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Halo 04" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Halo 04. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 30#Halo 04 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]