Talk:Saprotroph

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles

Fungi High‑importance

	Fungi portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi- can anyone explain the difference between a detritivore and a saprophore? Seems to be describing the same thing =).

I removed the reference to Monotropes because it appears to be incorrect. It states that Monotropes are known to be parasites on other plants. As I understand it, monotropes are not necesarily parasites, as some feed off off oragnic material in the soil rather than other living plants. Sheldrake 22:29, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I never addressed this. Quite simply, your understanding is wrong - there is no plant that breaks down soil organic matter as a food supply. Its quite simply physiologically impossible for plants to do this. Monotropes and other so-called "saprophytic" plants are myco-heterotrophs. Peter G Werner 07:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

82.46.236.51 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)detritus is waste and decaying matter, chemicals are used to hydrolyse this decaying matter; hence the term "detrivore". Recycling at its best :)[reply]

On the other hand, a saprophyte is the term to define species that hydrolyse chemicals in the environment. A saprophyte can be a detrivore. The specific enzymes used to degrade tissue or organic chemicals in the soil can be used for both means; ie it is NOT ALWAYS necessary for degrading decaying matter (as a detrivore). Bev, Exeter.82.46.236.51 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]