Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetCheapBooks

The result of the debate was delete [added by Andre🚐 23:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC) for afdstats][reply]

Wikipedia is not a web directory, non-notable (Alexa rank 325,893 - both other websites in Category:Product searching websites are around 10,000-11,000) website. —Stormie 03:53, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Delete Added to speedy delete as it's clearly spam. rhyax 05:37, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- looking further it is in a whole category of online retailers, product searching websites delete them all? rhyax 05:45, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  - Delete advertisement. Regarding Category:Product searching websites, if BookFinder.com and AddALL are non-notable or advertisements, then they should unequivocally be deleted as well. I don't see why we need a separate category for online retailers--it's not like people will come here, type "online retailers", and click on the first link that we present them. And such categories would encourage linkspam articles like GetCheapBooks, anyway. --Ardonik.talk() 20:52, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, Wikipedia is not a web directory and should only contain websites of encylopedic notability.--Ianb 06:23, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete, not of enough significance. Fuzheado | Talk 09:16, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: We can't say that all the items in the category go, but this one does. Spam. Geogre 13:29, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete - advert - Tεx τ urε 15:24, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable advert. (deleted speedy tag, as I can't see any case that it falls under) Niteowlneils 01:00, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I would say it's vandalism, "spam with inappropriate external links", but no big deal, I don't imagine it will magically survive this vfd anyway :) rhyax 04:35, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. WikiSpam. An article on shopping webcrawlers, or maybe a section on the phenomenon in web crawler, could be interesting though. — Gwalla | Talk 21:31, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

delete - advertFBarnes 15:50, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Clearly spam. Delete. Andre 20:03, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)