Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Kensington

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:41, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Blake Kensington

Non-notable. The article says that "his work can be found in Google searches", but it's not so. Delete. -- Mwanner 01:11, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 06:18, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Maybe if the article said what the name of his trilogy was, we could find out if he's notable or not but just to say that he's got a famous trilogy doesn't help much -Cookiemobsta 21:36, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.