User talk:Zensufi

Feel free to post comments regarding my revisions here!

Zizek's anti-Metaphysics

I like what you have done for this section. However, I think it lacks the slightly gentle curve that an entry, stylistically should have. That is to say, that the first sentence should sum up his anti-metaphysics, rather than jump into the parallax view, which though it is excellent that you have read this latest of texts, should be mentioned later in the section. I will make an attempt at a stylistic edit. Let me know what you think. DocFaustRoll 17:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see our efforts as collaborative rather than the result of my needing to pee on your work as I see some do on Wikipedia. I'd love it if you re-edited what I edited to fix what you think should be fixed. That last sentence may, for example, go off the deep end. DocFaustRoll 02:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Syphilis and Nietzsche

Welcome! Your edits were really no problem at all. This kind of information (almost speculation, if you realize how hard things like this are to verify) gets debated back and forth all the time. That's part of the "game" here, after all. A syphilus discussion is also on the Nietzsche talk page right now. They have some references there, but I've only read one of them and found it lacking in scholarly reliability. Let's both do some research and maybe someone else will chime in. Thanks for checking in. WBardwin 02:36, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

nice work on rapport

thanks for expanding the studies on rapport. The other ones need some work, but perhaps you could improve the relevant summary of rapport on the Neuro-linguistic programming article. --Comaze 12:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]