Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creating
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to Creation. – ABCD 01:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef. Alai 06:29, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to creation? Mgm|(talk) 08:21, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as MacGyver suggests. Average Earthman 10:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- redirect -- page history will show i attempted this, but mr. bensaccount thought this was a very important page and reverted twice. Ungtss 11:49, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Bensaccount would do well to notice the dictionary, over there. We don't need to disambiguate to the level of individual parts of speech. I've added an interwiki link to creation. As per MacGyverMagic, Redirect. Uncle G 16:05, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
- Keep - Wikipedia is a compendium. Bensaccount 22:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. -Casito⇝Talk 23:40, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Ironically, compendium explains that a compendium doesn't subdivide to the point of individual definitions. Uncle G 04:45, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
- Actually it does. There is no reason why it shouldn't. I wrote this article after people kept deleting valuable, though definite items. Bensaccount 22:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. --Carnildo 22:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect-Casito⇝Talk 23:40, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Creativity. This page is about what humans create, is it not? ---Rednblu | Talk 02:22, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, if you look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Creating, you'll find that this article is just fallout from the perennial Creationism debate. So, no, it's not necessarily about humans. Uncle G 04:45, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
- Good eye! Good eye! I think I see what you mean, Uncle G. So the content of the Creating page is a misleading end for all those links because this end page has only a picture of a human "Architect at his drawing board, 1893"--Not the "Angry God on his throne." Is that right? So the links in all of the Special:Whatlinkshere/Creating list are wrong! Is that what you are saying? Good eye! Good eye! So how do we fix all of this so that the high-school student coming through gets some good assistance in sorting out this adult world of confusion and Creation vs. evolution controversy? Can we simplify all of this to be useful for the high-school student that visits us? Does redirecting Creating to Creation solve it? ---Rednblu | Talk 07:19, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, if you look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Creating, you'll find that this article is just fallout from the perennial Creationism debate. So, no, it's not necessarily about humans. Uncle G 04:45, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
- Redirect to Creativity. Megan1967 04:38, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Concur with Megan, or transwiki to Wiktionary unless there is already a Wiktionary article like this. --SuperDude 04:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.