Talk:Layforce

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Layforce article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / British / European / Middle East / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	World War II task force

A fact from Layforce appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Layforce was a brigade-sized British commando force named after their commander Robert Laycock?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

Wikipedia

Comments

This ‘Layforce’ page has the same data as on the Commandos page plus yet another eulogy for Sterling and the SAS which already have their own pages? Is there anything going to be actually written about Layforce and its other 2000+ members? CVA

I added "was a light military force" to the first sentence because on the first read I had no idea what was being discussed. Apologies if "light" is the incorrect term... --Bookandcoffee 19:54, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some more, brief facts and explanations on this page drawn from one of the British demi-official histories 'Special Forces in the desert war 1940-1943' by Wynter, plus other official British sources. It is still a seriously inadequate and misleading piece. 81.19.57.130 14:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since my last post above I have entered up some additional hard facts and made a few corrections to previous writeup. It is still not very satisfactory.132.185.144.120 07:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MILHIST Assessment

What country did this force fight for? I seriously can't tell from the article. It may be implied, but it needs to be stated explicitly, preferably in the first sentence. LordAmeth 09:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]