Talk:USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Pro-US bias

From what I could gather in about three minutes reading articles that are linked to from this article, the US had been operating in the Persian Gulf in anti-Iranian efforts for a while when the mine incident happened. Not mentioning any of that, and portraying the whole thing as if Sammy B was just out for a little drive when attacked by the evil Iranians seems a bit.... weird. Perhaps someone might want to fix that? 90.231.213.142 (talk) 14:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above doesn't make sense and doesn't appear fixable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.32.25.180 (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree something is'nt quite right with this interpretation. Of events J.flea mm2 9248 (talk) 17:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent

Just noticed that the Operation Praying Mantis article states one frigate, one smaller vessel sunk, yet here it says one frigate, three smaller vessels. Rolinator 02:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice cleanup work, Wwoods. Two qs: why "variable-pitch" prop instead of "controllable-pitch," as the USN calls it? And why the Don't Tread On Me flag, which is flown solely by the active USN ship with the longest time in commission? Bbpen 16:18, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The DTOM flag is now flown by all commissioned ships in the USN. See First Navy Jack for the specifics. Don't know about the other. Jinian 02:41, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

I had thought variable-pitch was the usual term, but okay, I've changed it back. (Maybe someone should write the article :-). Personally, I think the DTOM jack demonstrates why flags shouldn't include writing, but there it is.

By the way the template I'm using is User:Wwoods/Perry class frigate page template. If you've any other suggestions for changes, feel free.

—wwoods 04:22, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Just a thought, but should this pic of the ship showing the mine damage be used on this page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ffg58minedamage2.jpg -m-i-k-e-y- 21:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like some dates and #s dont add up but been a long time.

Seems J.flea mm2 9248 (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]