User talk:Mirv
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Mirv has not edited Wikipedia since September 2, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Messages left here may not be seen for months. Use e-mail if you absolutely must contact me.
Administrator powers
[edit]If I have misused my magic powers in any way, this is the place to tell me.
Protection
[edit]Every page I protect is on the wrong version, of course, so to conserve valuable electrons, just leave a link to the page and a number from the list. Thanks.
If I accidentally protected a page to which I have made substantive edits, tell me here. I will unprotect it immediately.
Deletion
[edit]Did I speedy-delete something that wasn't a candidate? Did I delete something for which there was no consensus to delete? Tell me here.
You delete wikiarc without any trace? That does not seem constructive in my opinion. Who made you overlord of the wikiarc? --Rasmus Paludan 20:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- here's the trace. nobody made me overlord; I deleted it because it did not fit the criteria for inclusion of neologisms, i.e., because there are no reliable secondary sources available. any one of the 1000-odd other sysops could (and probably would) do the same. —Charles P._(Mirv) 21:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- In my opinion, your behavior is a valid secondary source! --Rasmus Paludan 21:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocking
[edit]Hi. Testing the powers of Wikipedia, my brother edited an article with my name, that you rightly deleted on 21:57, 14 Nov 2004. But now when I google my name, the only hit Google found is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_log_archive/November_2004_(2). Please, I'm asking you if you could delete me also from this entry (you can find who I am by searching in that page "21:57, 14 Nov 2004") , as I'm trying to protect my personal data and info on Internet, and I don't want my name poping up when someone google it. If you don't have the power or authorization to make this change, please, tell me to whom I need contact. My mail is antiqui.populi@gmail.com .Thank you very much, and please excuse me if this is not the right place or way to make this request, and excuse my lame english.
Rollback
[edit]Did I use the admin "rollback" feature on one of your edits without warning or explanation? Then I probably thought you were vandalizing, spamming, or otherwise editing in malice, and chances are good that you were: most of my rollbacks are of such edits. If you want to know why I reverted your edit, append your question to the end of this talk page.
Classical Greece and Rome Wikiproject
[edit]Come join us! Our current collaboration of the month is the Plutarch article.
Here's our insignia that you may use if you wish to join:
This user is a participant in WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome.
Saints Wikiproject
[edit]I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.
|
This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject. |
I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.
Thanks! --evrik 18:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
the annals
[edit][header added]
What chapter in the Annuls of Tacitus does he make mention or refers to the cruxifiction of Jesus Christ?
- Crucifixion? Nowhere. For what he does mention, see Tacitus on Jesus. —Charles P._(Mirv) 22:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Based on your comments here, you seem relatively knoweldgeable about the current Wikipedia consensus on how to display POV images in a NPOV manner. I was hoping that you could weigh in on a similar discussion at Talk:Pope_Pius_XII#Hirschberger_image. As you can tell from that page, I have already voiced my opinion on the matter, but I would appreciate your input whether you agree with me or not in this instance. As an added benefit, it seems like you have a history of contributing to catholicism-related articles. savidan(talk) (e@) 07:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Economy of Africa
[edit]Hi, you were a contributor to this article, which is on the verge of being delisted as a FA. Can you return to help? Urgently requires inline citations and enhanced information in a few places. It's been copy-edited nicely by Peirigill. Tony 04:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
For over a year this article has contained a section on Attila's youth (last 3 paras of "Background and beginnings") which appears to be based entirely on recent historical fiction... no sources are cited. I would have just deleted it but the article is listed as a core biography etc with you named as contact. So please either delete or cite a source if you know of one. 82.6.76.13 11:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Mirv, since you just looked over this article and request a cite, could you care to comment on an edit war we're having? We have an editor who's removing all citations from the article that link to the Stormfront website, on the grounds that it violates wikipedia policy to link to a hate site. The concern is that to reference such a site by linking to it will only increase the Google Pagerank of the hatesite-- something no one wants, except perhaps for the few neo-nazis who come to Wikipedia. The argument is made that nothing is lost, since the references are in the history (or else hidden in comments inside the wikicode).
I'm certainly no fan of neo-nazis and racists, but I'm loathe to start prohibiting links to sites based on their political content. Can you imagine the debate to decide what is and what isn't a hate site? Sure, the Neo-Nazis and the KKK are easy calls, but how about the Nation of Islam? the Jewish Defense League? or the Westboro Baptist Church (the "God Hates Fags" people)? Ugh-- what a nightmare.
The editor doesn't cite any policy to support the idea of hiding citations, I've never heard of just doing such a thing, but I'm hesistant to just edit war against it, as that doesn't really solve anything. Do you have an opinion on the matter or how it could be resolved? --Alecmconroy 03:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Just war
[edit]I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Just war, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Just war. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Since you worked on this article, just letting you know... Armon 00:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Jacuzzi
[edit]moved to talk:Jacuzzi
Hello Mirv, you uploaded this image long time back and tagged it with {{PD}} which is an obsolete tag. Could you provide some copyright information, so that a suitable tag could be put on. Regards, Shyam (T/C) 16:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- {{PD}} is copyright information. I got the image from the website of the national archives of Canada; they clearly state that it is public domain, though not precisely why, and I have no reason to doubt them. I'm not sure what else is necessary. —Charles P._(Mirv) 19:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
[edit] |
Happy Birthday, Mirv!  Wishing you a very happy birthday and an awesome upcoming year! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!  Best regards from the Birthday Committee and myself! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 18:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hi I am message you because you contributed a section to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars
Thanks, Travb (talk) 12:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
[edit]
|
The article Arabs and antisemitism, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page. |
Latin translation?
[edit]If I am following the thread correctly, you can translate Latin, and know a few other editors who can as well. Is this correct? If so, would you consider taking a stab at Versus de scachis? You can find the source here: [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maury Markowitz (talk • contribs) 23:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC).
Survey Invitation
[edit]Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage
[edit]Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. 22:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Pecorino-romano.jpg
[edit]
Hello,
I have been contacted directly concerning this post: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Pecorino-romano.jpg&oldid=6520084
My permission was never granted for the useage of that image, nor was this image purchased from me for use in this manner. For the short time this image was available on SXC, about 3 years ago, ALL of my images (including this particular image) had strict copyright restrictions attached to them. Not a single image was available for commercial re-distribution or use, and none of the image in my portfolio ever had any copyrights released for public domain. My permission was never sought, nor was it givien for this image to be used in this fashion.
I know that there are many amateur photographers who openly release their images with Creative COmmons licensing or give up their rights all together. I, however, have never given up one single copyright to any image and retain all rights to all of my images. While SXC is a great resource for free image material on the net, be sure that you read the license agreement that goes under every image on the site, to avoid mistakes like this from happening in the future.
I have asked for the image submission to be removed.
Thank you, Kelly Cline —The preceding incompletely signed comment was added by Kclinephoto (talk • contribs) 07:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Pecorino-romano.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on Image:Pecorino-romano.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Pecorino-romano.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Jeff G. 21:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- It was deleted by Garion96 (Talk | contribs) as a "copyright violation" at 00:21 on 19 March 2007 (UTC) per this log entry. Thank you for your understanding. — Jeff G. 00:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
hey buddy, stop deleting my thing of A.C.M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reaper90210 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 1 April 2007
- It appears that you failed to assert the notability of the "Anti Chris Maj group". — Jeff G. 22:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Armour and the Battle of Tours
[edit]I left a comment for you on that Talk page. Good edit though, I don't know how I missed it. Frankish heavy infantry - and I have the sources right here - were VERY heavy, carrying up to 70 pounds of armour and equipment. Much of it was wood, by the way, but it was very effective, none the less. old windy bear 14:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Nick.com article returned
[edit]Jonjonbt recreated the article Nick.com on April 15. I expanded and wikified the article to make it look more professional, but should it be re-redirected to the Nickelodeon article?? — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 21:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- yes, no question. Wikipedia:Notability (web) has some helpful guidelines, and the article doesn't appear to be based on reliable secondary sources about the website itself. —Charles P._(Mirv) 21:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Copyright
[edit]Not too sure now you come to mention it. Do i need to annihilate it? Whiskey in the Jar 10:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up! Consider it gone! Whiskey in the Jar 22:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- The other half of this discussion is at User talk:Whiskey in the Jar#userpage. Why do discussions have to be so difficult to follow? — Jeff G. 20:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Henry Morgan (Pirate)
[edit]Hi. Do you know Morgan's burial place? Thx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.244.90.85 (talk) 09:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The Times Archive
[edit]I may be confused but the Wikipedia rsource exchange page seems to suggest you have access to an online archive of The Times. I'm looking for some front pages to show major events of 1977 and was wondering if this was something that you could help with
regards
Richard
richardworthington@:yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.31.124.130 (talk) 12:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Newspaper article request
[edit]Someone requested an article from the New York Times at the Resource Exchange (formerly the Newspaper and magazine request service, now merged with three other projects). Could you take a look at it, please? See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange#Cross_Bronx_Expressway. Key to the city (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
The request has been filled, nevermind. Key to the city (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "K"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "L"s through "O"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Typo redirect Dark Characters in the Wheel of Time:
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dark Characters in the Wheel of Time:, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dark Characters in the Wheel of Time: is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dark Characters in the Wheel of Time:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Constellation Records Logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Constellation Records Logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Spine of the World
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spine of the World, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 15:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange
[edit]Hi there, I am wondering if you could look at a New York Times article for me. I saw your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange and it says you have access to New York Times achieve up till 1999. The article I want to see is named "THE MAKE-UP OF CABINETS: HOW THE STATES HAVE CONTRIBUTED; An Analysis of the Membership of Forty-two Advisory Bodies Which Served the Presidents and Have Passed Into History" published in 1933. You can reply me on my talk page and I hope to hear from you soon. Thanks for your help.—Chris! ct 07:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-exclusive ethnic group
[edit]AfD nomination of Non-exclusive ethnic group
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Non-exclusive ethnic group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-exclusive ethnic group. Thank you. Slrubenstein | Talk 16:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC) .
Unknown bug the first.JPG
[edit]The image you posted is a Zebra Longwing(Heliconius charithonia) that has lost the coloration probably do to weathering or to much handling. Bugboy52.40 (talk 22:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC
New York Times archive
[edit]Hi Mirv, you have listed yourself at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Shared_Resources#Newspaper.2C_periodical_and_peer_review_journal_archives at having good access to NY Times archives. I am in the process of writing an article, and a lot of the information I will require are to be found in numerous newspaper articles. A list of the articles I am chasing is at User:Russavia/Requests. Are you able to fulfill any requests for any of these articles? Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, --Russavia Dialogue 03:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for the kind award and words. Cla68 (talk) 04:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Shahadah.PNG listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shahadah.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Do you please have access to The Times online archive? I am trying to check this fellow's military career and whether he was in fact a general. See his talk page Talk:Lionel_Gough_Arbuthnot. Kittybrewster ☎ 17:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Arab world.PNG listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arab world.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Please see this talkpage about an article created about you
[edit]User:Borut Pahor created Mirv which seems to be about you. --Morenooso (talk) 05:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
File:DSCF01262.jpg missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Template:Mythological king of Sweden has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Wiki project: need info on the photo you posted please
[edit]Hi Mirv. I am a new Wiki contributor assisting in backlog clean-up. A photo you posted is listed because we lack any information regarding the pic. Could you please help me?
Here's a link to your pic on the project page (1st one listed) -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Incomplete_file_renaming_requests
Thank you, US2Wheels (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)US2Wheels
The Globe and Mail
[edit]I see that you have access to The Globe and Mail's online archives. It would be very much appreciated if you could please search for a review of Usher's My Way, or any other info to do with the song "You Make Me Wanna". Thanks. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
interview request
[edit]Hello, My name is Natalia Ioana Olaru and I am a final year master student in the Corporate Communication programme at the Aarhus School of Business in Denmark. I am currently working on my final paper on the topic of user motivation to create content on collaborative media websites, the focus being Wikipedia. As a sample I chose the English and Danish portals. I would like to invite you for an online interview on the topic of what motivates you, to participate in editing and creating articles for this platform. I plan on doing the actual interviews in the period between 1st and the 15th of May via Skype, MSN or Yahoo Messenger. I am, however, open to other channels of communication too. Please let me know if you would like to participate in this interview and the preferred channel.
Thank you, Natalia Olaru Email: natalia.ioana.olaru@gmail.com MulgaEscu (talk) 13:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
You've got mail!
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
--Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 17:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xenotalk 15:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xenotalk 12:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xenotalk 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Notice of change
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
sator square
[edit]Hi, I have a theorie concerning the stor square. What if the words don't necessarily have a meaning but the symbologie does. Showing duality that is the same just backwards and the middle path being in balance is never changing always the same.Since dualities are perceptions of the mind which make you see thing accordingly to that duality like love or hate which in the same situation have different perceptions, but hence just the same illuzion backwards. Mysticism preaches the middle path which sees things the way they are and not the way you want to see them. For talk darzo@live.ca — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.211.85 (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Daniel Coit Gilman.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Daniel Coit Gilman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Global account
[edit]Hi Mirv! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Education changes
[edit]Juhayman al-Otaybi wikipedia page having a tag Infobox criminal, I want to include his education as 'Islamic University of Madinah' at the right side, could not edit the article at the right side, just I has made the changes to the main article. . Juhayman al-Otaybi neither represented to Umm Al-Qura University nor he was student. But still Google Knowledge base result shows his education refers to Umm Al-Qura University, but has studied through Islamic University of Madinah. Our prime object is we don't want to see him in Google Knowledge base results as Notable Alumni. Please suggest how can we proceed to make the changes.
Younusm (talk) 05:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Please claim your upload(s): File:Mirvseyes.jpg
[edit]
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,
However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.
If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
:_File:Mirvseyes.jpg){kind=link}
The file File:MorThanFeastofAttila-headdetail.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
"Haligonian" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haligonian. Since you had some involvement with the Haligonian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
"Your Head Asplode" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Your Head Asplode has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26 § Your Head Asplode until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
The file File:Crude ruler.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, low quality. No obvious use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
