Talk:Blalock–Thomas–Taussig shunt

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Blalock–Thomas–Taussig shunt.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

On 27 May 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Blalock–Thomas–Taussig shunt. The result of the discussion was not moved.

note

Hallo Charles, thank you for your help. I'm german and much better in reading than in writing. Interested in congenital heart diseasesErs 15:04, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This article should be renamed the Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt, and the current name should redirect to that page name. Citation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14525641 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.87.39.215 (talk) 22:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 May 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved - no evidence has been provided that the proposed name is the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blalock–Taussig shunt → Blalock–Thomas–Taussig shunt – This surgical method has been renamed the "Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt" in order to give credit to Vivien Thomas, a key inventor of the method who was not previously given credit. This change has been reflected in the article itself but not the title of the article. Mch232823 (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. No such user (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). wbm1058 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The cited references refer to this as "The Blalock-Taussig shunt" or "Blalock and Taussig shunt". Can references be added that refer to it by the proposed name? wbm1058 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also the MOS–en dash folks are probably gonna want to use those instead of hyphens. wbm1058 (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'm not the nominator, but I updated the request with the correct dash per MOS:DASH. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.