Talk:Consensus government in Canada

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"In this system, all citizens of a territory are entitled to stand for election in their electoral district"

How is this different from most democratic systems? — Trilobite (Talk) 20:13, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

___

So, wait, let me get this straight...a Consensus government is...a government...that rule(s) based on consensus... ...Right...

Is there an active ban on political party activity, or is the government just indifferent to political parties? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.227.246 (talk) 18:58, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

It is down to apathy.

There are eight electoral districts with between six and eight representatives in each district with very high chances of winning a seat, for example in one district at the last election there were eight seats and 11 candidates - so you had a pretty good chance of being elected. the system is blighted by the low calibre of the candidates who stand for election meaning the government is usually incompetent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchisthans (talk • contribs) 21:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page is being edited by Guernsey politicians who oppose any crticism of the Guernsey's political system - it is a fact that consensus government is simply majority voting - it is not consensus decision making. Whoever is deleting these comments please explain why! It is a factual statement, not an opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchisthans (talk • contribs) 21:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are three good reasons to remove the text:

It's obvious from the rest of the text, and it is explicitly stated already in the third paragraph. No one is trying to make it look like it is the same as consensus decision making.
Stating that "it's a fact, stop removing it" in the text of the article is inappropriate and should be removed regardless of whether or not it's accurate.
Wikipedia is not for the provision of facts, it's for the provision of verifiable information from third party sources. Whether or not the information is factual is not relevant.

99.236.33.105 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consensus government in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202194416/http://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/visitorinfo/factsheets/index.html to http://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/visitorinfo/factsheets/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]