Jump to content

User talk:Burdfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Burdfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Spinboy 18:06, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Society of St James
UK Charity No 263710
First registered March 16, 1972
Expenditure 2002/3 £28,582,000
Area of Activity Southampton

Welcome

[edit]

I see you are a recent recruit to "schools" project. I looked at St. George Catholic School for Boys and saw that you had tried an assessment. Well done. Be bold ... however you misunderstood, i think the categories. If you look at schools ... and then go to assessment... you will see where and how this is done. I hope this doesnt put you off .. im trying to offer help and encouragement Victuallers 09:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For creating many good school articles for the Hampshire area and helping to edit many that already exist. Camaron1 | Chris 19:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Camaron1 | Chris 19:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random note

[edit]

Hey, I just happened to notice the message you left on Doc Glasgow's talk page re Bitterne Park Secondary School. By sheer coincidence, I attended that school in what must have been the mid-late 1980s. There's probably not much I can do to help if you do recreate it -- it was a long time ago and I've moved from Southampton -- but I'd be interested to read the article if you do, especially if it has gained notability in any way. Best wishes, Jakew 21:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

keep up the good work! MasterEditor99 19:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bitterne Park school.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bitterne Park school.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Redbridge school.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Redbridge school.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Digital heritage. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The Digital Heritage article was deleted as per WP:CSD#G12: blatant copyright infringement (www.routledge.com/books/Recoding-the-Museum-isbn9780415353885). — Athaenara 03:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sholing logo.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sholing logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grove Park Business and Enterprise College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grove Park Business and Enterprise College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

बिनोद थारू (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]