Talk:Unscientific

OK, I had questions about this being a meaningful article to begin with, but by doing things like calling Plato's work "ridiculous" this has gone beyond NPOV and I'm going to suggest it be deleted. -- Zoe

2) The early human civilizations developed independently. They have never had a common cradle, and none of them has been devastated by a cataclysmic flood.

Well, Toynbee has provided evidence that most civilizations were affiliated to another civilization. The most obvious example is 'Western Christendom' and 'Graeco-Roman society'. Maybe what is meant by no comman cradle is to deny that all civilization started from the ancient 'Egyptiac society'.

I wouldn't mind if the whole article were moved to meta-Wikipedia. It's not encyclopedia material, without a heavy rewrite. --Uncle Ed

Content removed as per talk. Moving to m:unscientific.

It was originally added to taboo. --Uncle Ed

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Scientific_method#Problems_and_issues]] The anchor (Problems and issues) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Redirect destination changed

I felt the Scientific method article was a better article to redirect searches on "unscientific" to, since virtually anything that can be accurately labeled as unscientific, can be proven so based on its failure to meet the scientific method standard. The Science article, being less broad, would be more likely confusing and/or distracting to someone unfamiliar with scientific method who was trying to figure out what "unscientific" really means (beyond a simple dictionary definition). --the Jack [not logged in]