Jump to content

Talk:Doll

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 5 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maya Moreno.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kewpie doll

[edit]

I have heard someone saying "cupie doll" what is that?

It's kewpie doll.
[edit]

I have reverted to last vertion because history section was nicked from this page which has a copyright notice on it that does not allow modification of content. Cavebear42 20:01, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Kokeshi

[edit]

Any reason why Kokeshi is not listed here? --21:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Almost five years later, they are now mentioned. :) Siawase (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture with dolls in Hungary

[edit]

The doll not from porcellan, this is not korrekt. The Material ist biggidur. --172.176.197.157 14:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. Shannernanner 10:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

China Doll

[edit]

Could someone please write an article on porcelain dolls so I can link to it from the China Doll (disambiguation) page. --Gbleem 23:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

China doll is now a full-fledged article. Siawase (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poor English

[edit]

Poor English and Ugly Format This article needs a total rehaul. Aside from being poorly written, and including long lists of meaningless names, the photo layout is awful. --Gilabrand 18:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the lead section, resized and rearranged the pictures, and added a category for doll collections and museums which people are invited to add to.

--Gilabrand 08:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cornhusk Dolls

[edit]

There is no Wikipedia page on Cornhusk or Corn Husk (two words) dolls anywhere. Cornhusk dolls are culturally important especially in Native American Indian cultures (and they now exist in many other parts of the world as well). We need something on Wikipedia about Cornhusk dolls. At least a stub. I don't know how to set up a new page myself but maybe someone could quickly do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.5.244 (talk) 02:18, 30 September 2010

 Done Corn husk doll. --Shirt58 (talk) 10:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great job! Corn husk dolls were mentioned in this article briefly, but I expanded a bit based on the new article and added a link to it. Siawase (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roman doll

[edit]

This was unsourced and a bit too detailed for an overview article like this, but I didn't want it to just get lost so I copied it here:

One doll, found near Prati in Rome, was made of ivory and lay beside her owner who had died at the age of eighteen. Next to the doll was a small box, also made of ivory, containing tiny combs and a silver mirror. The doll had rings on her fingers and held a tiny key, which unlocked the box.

Siawase (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbie 1959 First Editions.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Barbie 1959 First Editions.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Barbie 1959 First Editions.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doll can be also a toy for dog

[edit]

Dogs playing with dolls is quite common too. Its not just human toy as stated in first sentence of article. There are also images on internet with dogs carrying dolls in their mouth, such as http://puppysites.com/deluxe/k-ninedobie.jpg and http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7047/6983586919_f96cfcb6a7_z.jpg. In fact, my pet dog loved to carry a doll in its mouth and toss/fetch it. Even zoo animals like monkeys are known to play with dolls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.164.126 (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miniature Doll House Dolls and Doll Houses

[edit]

I thought the Doll article was very well done. I would like to see a section on Doll House Dolls and Dollhouses, and a link to a separate article on Doll House Dolls and Doll Houses.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsadollworld (talk • contribs) 11:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link to Dollhouse. If you have information supported references about dolls made specifically for a dollhouse, then feel free to add it! --Derek Andrews (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Doll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Doll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dolls

[edit]

Dolls are the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.68.136 (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gender & "Maternal Instinct"

[edit]

In the section on "Uses, appearances and issues", someone makes the following claim, which I have marked as Citation Needed:

"Dolls have also traditionally been toys for young girls who, as opposed to boys, possess a maternal instinct."

This claim is questionable to me, and has no source. I'm sure there have got to be some sources on the history of dolls created for children, and I'm willing to bet it's a complicated argument that nobody agrees on. Whatever there is, it's likely more nuanced than just "girls have a maternal instinct". I'm pretty sure there are arguments out there that maternal instinct doesn't exist at all in humans, and dolls are used to make up for that and train girls for motherhood; rather than catering to innate qualities, dolls could be a tool for enforcing gender expectations via early training.

In comparison, the article for Fashion doll stays fairly neutral on gender: "They are manufactured both as toys for children to play with and as barbie collectibles for adult collectors."

Going that route is overkill; dolls definitely have a gendered history as toys created primarily for girls. But we need to be able to make sourced claims instead of assumptions based on gender stereotypes. IdentifierExpected (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One editor did a slew of unsourced edits with a strong WP:POV, I don't see any good reason why any of them should be kept:[1] Siawase (talk) 19:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

The article might have a "See also" section. One entry might be Sex doll. But I wonder if such a cross-reference might be a red flag for those who are concerned that the Doll article, or Wikipedia more generally, would be inappropriate for children; an undesirable consequence to be sure. This discourages me from creating such a section. Larry Koenigsberg (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Art dolls

[edit]

I'm trying to add some information about art dolls, a little at a time, but my links to examples of them are being removed. How can I provide examples for the article please? HappyGertrude (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Write about the subject in the article and use more than one reliable references (WP:RS) that are not spammy sites selling the dolls. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Doll&oldid=1194038792"