Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eazel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Yes, I'm closing this almost a decade later, but since it was not formally closed then, I'm closing it now.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A company that went out of business in 2001 and apparently didn't succeed in doing what they set out to do. RickK 23:15, Jul 4, 2004 (UTC)

Keep, this company is fairly well known and they did create the Nautilus file manager, which is standard in GNOME desktop. Burgundavia 01:32, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Keep: notable failure. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:37, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Just barely notable enough for inclusion. We have articles on many people, companies, nations, deities, etc. that didn't succeed in doing what they set out to do. Hey, Einstein didn't nail the unified field theory, Napoleon didn't conquer the world, and Schubert didn't finish his eighth symphony. Dpbsmith 23:26, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep: there was much hype about this product / company some years ago. Keep this page
Keep cesarb 23:26, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.